Means and End(ing)s: Nomos Versus Narrative in Early Rabbinic Exegesis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDohrmann, Natalie B
dc.date2023-05-17T18:03:52.000
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T01:09:15Z
dc.date.available2016-02-06T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.date.submitted2017-09-08T10:21:50-07:00
dc.description.abstractRabbinic literature shares a suggestive array of literary features with later Latin literary sources: commentary, fragmentation and quotation, and a granular attention to language. In this material narrative tends to be lost; classical source texts, such as Vergil, are fetishized, broken apart, and repurposed. In this essay I ask of one corpus--early rabbinic midrash (biblical commentary)--what is the origin and impact of its fragmented and finally incoherent narrative project? At the risk of over-simplifying, I will focus on the rabbis as a case study in the etiology of a more general phenomenon. I will argue that the fragmentation so typical of aggadic midrash is the result of the application of a specifically legal hermeneutic to nonlegal, specifically narrative, sources. As a result, rabbinic midrash beginning in the third century consistently undercuts its own narrative aims. Metaliterary, anthologized, pastiched, commentarial forms become standard in the late antique Roman repertoire, with rabbinic texts we can historicize and contextualize one such transformation, and in so doing center law, legal thinking and forms into literary genealogies.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/45808
dc.legacy.articleid1003
dc.legacy.fulltexturlhttps://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=rs_papers&unstamped=1
dc.rightsThis article is available under Creative Common Attribution License. Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
dc.source.beginpage30
dc.source.endpage49
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.journalDepartmental Papers (Religious Studies)
dc.source.journaltitleCritical Analysis of Law: An International and Interdisciplinary Law Review
dc.source.peerreviewedtrue
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.source.volume3
dc.subject.otherJewish Studies
dc.subject.otherLegal
dc.subject.otherReligion
dc.subject.otherReligion Law
dc.titleMeans and End(ing)s: Nomos Versus Narrative in Early Rabbinic Exegesis
dc.typeArticle
digcom.contributor.authorisAuthorOfPublication|email:dohrmann@sas.upenn.edu|institution:University of Pennsylvania|Dohrmann, Natalie B
digcom.date.embargo2016-02-06T00:00:00-08:00
digcom.identifierrs_papers/5
digcom.identifier.contextkey10727297
digcom.identifier.submissionpathrs_papers/5
digcom.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b278db7-fbf3-4981-93d7-4a8aeaf169a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5b278db7-fbf3-4981-93d7-4a8aeaf169a0
upenn.schoolDepartmentCenterDepartmental Papers (Religious Studies)
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Means_and_Endings_Nomos_Versus_Narrative_in_Early_Rabbinic_Exegesis.pdf
Size:
210.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collection
Articles