Building a Stronger Instrument in an Observational Study of Perinatal Care for Premature Infants

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Statistics Papers
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
design sensitivity
effect ratio
instrumental variable
nonbipartite matching
observational study
optimal matching
sensitivity analysis
Statistics and Probability
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Baiocchi, Mike
Small, Dylan
Lorch, Scott A
Rosenbaum, Paul R
Contributor
Abstract

An instrument is a random nudge toward acceptance of a treatment that affects outcomes only to the extent that it affects acceptance of the treatment. Nonetheless, in settings in which treatment assignment is mostly deliberate and not random, there may exist some essentially random nudges to accept treatment, so that use of an instrument might extract bits of random treatment assignment from a setting that is otherwise quite biased in its treatment assignments. An instrument is weak if the random nudges barely influence treatment assignment or strong if the nudges are often decisive in influencing treatment assignment. Although ideally an ostensibly random instrument is perfectly random and not biased, it is not possible to be certain of this; thus a typical concern is that even the instrument might be biased to some degree. It is known from theoretical arguments that weak instruments are invariably sensitive to extremely small biases; for this reason, strong instruments are preferred. The strength of an instrument is often taken as a given. It is not. In an evaluation of effects of perinatal care on the mortality of premature infants, we show that it is possible to build a stronger instrument, we show how to do it, and we show that success in this task is critically important. We also develop methods of permutation inference for effect ratios, a key component in an instrumental variable analysis.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2010-01-01
Journal title
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Recommended citation
Collection