Should We Broaden the Fuel Tax Base?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Wharton Public Policy Initiative Issue Briefs
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
carbon tax
fuel tax
fuel consumption
tax revenue
Business
Environmental Policy
Taxation
Funder
Grant number
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Should We Broaden the Fuel Tax Base? (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v1n7.php)
Author
Marion, Justin
Contributor
Abstract

Currently, the rules of fuel taxation in the U.S., like the U.S. tax code more generally, is complex and riddled with inconsistencies. The tax rate applied to carbon-based fuels varies widely depending on the type of fuel, purpose of consumption, and identity of the user. These inconsistencies only invite tax evasion and result in fuel tax revenues that fall short of even covering the costs associated with fuel consumption. Not simply for the sake of environmental policy, but as a matter of deficit reduction, the tax reform concept of base broadening can and should be applied to fuel taxation. Taxing carbon-based fuels more consistently will lead to increased revenues without raising the tax rate. The resultant gain in tax revenue could be as high as $28 billion per year at current levels of fuel consumption.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2013-07-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Associate Professor of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz Visiting Associate Professor of Business Economics and Public Policy, The Wharton School
Recommended citation
Collection