The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Bone and soft tissue integration
Dental implant
Osseointegration
Surface modification
Titanium
antiinfective agent
arginylglycylaspartic acid
bisphosphonic acid derivative
bone morphogenetic protein
calcium chloride
fibroblast growth factor
fluoride
hydroxyapatite
hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor
nanocomposite
neutralizing antibody
p15 peptide
peptides and proteins
platelet derived growth factor
platelet-rich fibrin
polyetheretherketone
polypeptide antibiotic agent
sclerostin neutralizing
strontium incorporated protein
synthetic peptide
titanium
unclassified drug
zirconium oxide
amination
anodic oxidation
antibacterial activity
atmospheric pressure plasma processing
biofilm
chemical modification
cleaning
coating (procedure)
dental acid etching
discrete crystalline deposition
equipment design
extracellular matrix
human
hydrophilicity
laser surgery
length
mechanics
metal implantation
nanotechnology
nitration
nonhuman
osseointegration
oxidation
physical chemistry
physical parameters
plasma
plasma oxidation
processing
Review
roughness
sulfonation
surface property
thrombocyte rich plasma
tooth implantation
ultraviolet radiation
Dental Materials
Dentistry
Endodontics and Endodontology
Oral Biology and Oral Pathology
Orthodontics and Orthodontology
Periodontics and Periodontology
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
Implant surface design has evolved to meet oral rehabilitation challenges in both healthy and compromised bone. For example, to conquer the most common dental implant-related complications, peri-implantitis, and subsequent implant loss, implant surfaces have been modified to introduce desired properties to a dental implant and thus increase the implant success rate and expand their indications. Until now, a diversity of implant surface modifications, including different physical, chemical, and biological techniques, have been applied to a broad range of materials, such as titanium, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone, to achieve these goals. Ideal modifications enhance the interaction between the implant’s surface and its surrounding bone which will facilitate osseointegration while minimizing the bacterial colonization to reduce the risk of biofilm formation. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss currently available implant surface modifications commonly used in implantology in terms of their impact on osseointegration and biofilm formation, which is critical for clinicians to choose the most suitable materials to improve the success and survival of implantation. © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.