Regulating Robo Advisors: Old Policy Goals, New Challenges

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Finance
Finance and Financial Management

Funder

Grant number

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Regulating Robo Advisors: Old Policy Goals, New Challenges (https://publicpolicy.wharton.upenn.edu/issue-brief/v5n7.php)

Contributor

Abstract

Financial “robo advice”—an automated service that ranks or matches consumers to financial products—has gained significant attention in the investment industry and on the Hill, but there has not yet been a consensus on how to regulate these new services. Robo advisors often are on par with and can exceed the standards of human advices, but they don’t fit into the category of fiduciary, and therefore won’t be held to the same regulatory standard that humans advisors are. Nonetheless, they are subject to systemic risks and the potential for abuses that can hurt consumers. Professors Tom Baker and Benedict Dellaert offer a regulatory trajectory to follow as the technology of robo advisors continues to develop and expand.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2017-07-01

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation

Collection