The Logic of Sanctioning Welfare Recipients: An Empirical Assessment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Related Collections

Degree type

Discipline

Subject

Funder

Grant number

License

Copyright date

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

The 1996 welfare reform legislation expanded the use of sanctions under the assumption that welfare recipients can comply with work requirements and that they can calculate the costs and benefits of compliance. This research tests the validity of these assumptions through a record- and survey-based study of California welfare recipients. The article questions the validity of the assumptions, finding that, compared to nonsanctioned recipients, sanctioned recipients face greater barriers to meeting the work requirements. A significant proportion say that they were not informed about the sanctioning rules. Almost half of sanctioned recipients were not aware that they were sanctioned.

Advisor

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Publication date

2004-06-01

Journal title

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Copyright The University of Chicago Press. Reprinted from Social Service Review, Volume 78, Issue 2, June 2004, pages 304-319. NOTE: At the time of publication, author Toorjo Ghose was affiliated with the University of California. Currently, July 2007, he is a faculty member in the School of Social Policy and Practice at the University of Pennsylvania.

Recommended citation

Collection