HOW THE HEALTH INDUSTRY IN CHINA MANAGES ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS UNDER INCREASINGLY STRINGENT ESG REQUIREMENTS: A PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY CHAIN PERSPECTIVE

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Degree type

Master of Environmental Studies (MES)

Graduate group

Discipline

Environmental Studies

Subject

Environmental Risks
Corporate Sustainability
Environmental Economics
ESG
Supply Chain

Funder

Grant number

Copyright date

2025

Distributor

Related resources

Contributor

Abstract

This study examines environmental risks and ESG practices in China's pharmaceutical supply chains, focusing on both Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCM) and conventional pharmaceuticals. For TCM, key input risks include biodiversity loss and habitat disruption, while output risks involve waste generation contributing to soil and water pollution. Conventional pharmaceuticals face input risks from petroleum dependence in API synthesis and output risks such as CO2 emissions and untreated pharmaceutical waste from energy-intensive manufacturing. Through a literature review, Sustainability report analysis, and a case study of Zhejiang Medicine, the research identifies gaps in companies' environmental priorities. While carbon and waste management are emphasized, critical issues like land use and biodiversity impacts, particularly in TCM, are often overlooked. Key drivers for improved practices include China’s “dual carbon” policy and international client demands for stricter environmental standards. The findings highlight the need for tailored strategies: nature-based solutions and land-use management for TCM, and enhanced supplier audits and oversight frameworks for both supply chains. This research offers actionable insights to improve environmental risk management and promote sustainable practices in the pharmaceutical industry.

Date of degree

2024

Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)

Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)

Digital Object Identifier

Series name and number

Volume number

Issue number

Publisher

Publisher DOI

Journal Issues

Comments

Recommended citation