The Ombudsman: Are Top Executives Paid Enough? An Evidence-Based Review
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
cooperatives
corporate governance
democracy
employee selection
executive compensation
incentives
index methods
judgmental bootstrapping
Mondragon
motivation
pay
performance
stakeholders
Accounting
Marketing
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
Our review of the evidence found that the notion that higher pay leads to the selection of better executives is undermined by the prevalence of poor recruiting methods. Moreover, higher pay fails to promote better performance. Instead, it undermines the intrinsic motivation of executives, inhibits their learning, leads them to ignore other stakeholders, and discourages them from considering the long-term effects of their decisions on stakeholders. Relating incentive payments to executives’ actions in an effective manner is not possible. Incentives also encourage unethical behavior. Organizations would benefit from using validated methods to hire top executives, reducing compensation, eliminating incentive plans, and strengthening stockholder governance related to the hiring and compensation of executives.