Editor's Introduction: Epistemic Boundaries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Departmental Papers (HSS)
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
science
epistemology
History
History of Science, Technology, and Medicine
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

As science studies scholars, one of our basic tasks is to draw the boundaries that will define our units of inquiry and constrain the chronological and geographical limits of our studies. Without these boundaries, the categories of our analysis remain imprecise. Fortunately, we now have an extensive toolkit to help us with this task. With paradigms, research programs, epistemic cultures, or styles of reasoning, historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science now have a large set of resources for locating the fissures and discontinuities in science. The papers from the focused discussion of this issue of Spontaneous Generations present us with an opportunity to take a step back and examine the ways that science studies scholars are currently drawing boundaries. In reviewing the articles for this discussion, our aim as editors was to reflect on what boundaries scholars were paying attention to and what use we can make of these boundaries.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2010-01-11
Journal title
Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
At the time of publication, author Sebastián Gil-Riaño was affiliated with the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology at the University of Toronto. Currently, he is a faculty member at the Department of History and Sociology of Science at the University of Pennsylvania.
Recommended citation
Collection