Cybernetics’s Reflexive Turns
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
reflexivity
observation
participation
Arts and Humanities
Communication
Communication Technology and New Media
Engineering
Epistemology
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Other Social and Behavioral Sciences
Philosophy of Language
Sociology
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
In the history of cybernetics there have been several attempts by cyberneticians to put themselves into the circularities of their theories and designs, invoking a shift from the cybernetics of mechanisms to a cybernetics of cybernetics. The latter is the title of a book chapter by Margaret Mead (1968) and of Heinz von Foerster’s (1974) edited compilation of articles on cybernetics. Foerster introduced the concept of second-order cybernetics which may have overshadowed or sidelined other reflexivities. I am attempting to recover four reflexive turns, describe their origin, implications, and suggest ways in which they continue what Karl Müller (2007) calls an unfinished revolution. These turns are not discussed here in their historical succession but as conceptual expansions of cybernetics.