Cosmetic Neurology and Cosmetic Surgery: Parallels, Predictions, and Challenges

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Neuroethics Publications
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Medicine and Health Sciences
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

As our knowledge of the functional and pharmacological architecture of the nervous system increases, we are getting better at treating cognitive and affective disorders. Along with the ability to modify cognitive and affective systems in disease, we are also learning how to modify these systems in health. “Cosmetic neurology,” the practice of intervening to improve cognition and affect in healthy individuals, raises several ethical concerns.1 However, its advent seems inevitable.2 In this paper I examine this claim of inevitability by reviewing the evolution of another medical practice, cosmetic surgery. Cosmetic surgery also enhances healthy people and, despite many critics, it is practiced widely. Can we expect the same of cosmetic neurology? The claim of inevitability poses a challenge for both physicians and bioethicists. How will physicians reconsider their professional role? Will bioethicists influence the shape of cosmetic neurology? But first, how did cosmetic surgery become common?

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2007-01-01
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
<p>Suggested Citation: <br /> Chatterjee, A. (2007). Cosmetic Neurology and Cosmetic Surgery: Parallels, Predictions, and Challenges. <em>Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.</em> Vol. 16. p. 129-137. <br /><br /> © Cambridge University Press <br /><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=CQH"> http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=CQH</a></p>
Recommended citation
Collection