Because the cost of health care is increasing, more Americans are relying on crowdfunding to finance their health care expenses. Health care crowdfunding occurs when people seek donations through online crowdfunding platforms to pay for their health care costs. This thesis seeks to use theories in charitable giving and health care crowdfunding to understand if crowdfunding dollars are going to the people who need them most. Low-income individuals in non-Medicaid expansion states and patients with chronic diseases are not adequately covered by the private insurance market, thus they require the most need. However, donors evaluate need subjectively and are more likely to donate to those who are like them. As such, statistically analyzing GoFundMe campaigns reveals that crowdfunding campaigns for low-income individuals and chronically ill patients are less successful. These finding contribute to charitable giving literature in contextualizing a modern phenomenon within a rich body of private provision for basic goods theories. Moreover, they contribute to the health care crowdfunding literature by being the first study to test whether health care crowdfunding is addressing people with the greatest need for it. The implications for these findings are that health care crowdfunding falls short of addressing the market frictions of private insurance markets. Thus, crowdfunding is not a sustainable solution.