Departmental Papers (Classical Studies)
Document Type
Review
Date of this Version
1-2014
Publication Source
American Journal of Archaeology
Volume
118
Issue
1
DOI
10.3764/ajaonline1181.Bowes
Abstract
This fine volume is a natural successor to the two fundamental Mediterranean field survey collections: Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages (R. Francovich, H. Patterson, and G. Barker, eds. [Oxford 2000]) and Side by Side Survey (S. Alcock and J. Cherry, eds. [Oxford 2004]). Its best essays illustrate the advances in both methodology and theory that have characterized landscape archaeology over the decade since those fundamental volumes were published. The volume takes up the problem of classification, that is, the interpretative and evidentiary basis by which surface survey material is functionally classified. Both intentionally and tacitly, the volume also illustrates the assumptions underlying all classificatory systems and thus the challenges surface survey faces as a stand-alone tool for historical interpretation.
Copyright/Permission Statement
This work was originally published by the Archaeological Institute of America in American Journal of Archaeology. You can view the original work at: https://www.ajaonline.org/book-review/1732
Recommended Citation
Bowes, K. (2014). Review of Peter A.J. Attema and Günter Schörner, Comparative Issues in the Archaeology of the Roman Rural Landscape: Site Classification Between Survey, Excavation and Historical Categories. American Journal of Archaeology, 118 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.3764/ajaonline1181.Bowes
Included in
Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons
Date Posted: 18 October 2017
This document has been peer reviewed.