Departmental Papers (Classical Studies)

Document Type

Book Chapter

Date of this Version

2012

Publication Source

Perpetua’s Passions: Pluridisciplinary Approaches to the Passio Perpetuae et Felicitatis

Start Page

300

Last Page

320

Abstract

Not very long ago, the concepts of 'canon' and 'canonization' were much discussed, and even hotly contested, in literary and academic circles. The fact that these controversies have died down somewhat in the last few years might give the impression that we now live in a post-canonical age. But of course canons of various kinds, even if they occasion less debate and are defined and defended with less fervour, continue to govern the ways in which academic research and education proceed. One particular kind of canon is the reading list published by most if not all PhD programmes. The meaning of such lists is not always entirely clear, but one can probably assume that they are efforts to define what is essential, if not sufficient, for every prospective classicist to read as part of his or her basic training in the discipline.

Copyright/Permission Statement

Reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press: dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199561889.001.0001.

Included in

Classics Commons

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 05 January 2017