Center for Bioethics Papers

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version



Articulating the public’s widespread unease about animal biotechnology has not been easy, and the first attempts have not been able to provide an effective tool for navigating the moral permissibility of this research. Because these moral intuitions have been difficult to cash out, they have been belittled as representing nothing more than fear or confusion. But there are sound philosophical reasons supporting the public’s opposition to animal biotechnology and these arguments justify a default position of resistance I call the Presumption of Restraint. The Presumption of Restraint constitutes a justificatory process that sets out the criteria for permitting or rejecting individual biotechnology projects. This Presumption of Restraint can be overridden by compelling arguments that speak to a project’s moral and scientific merit. This strategy creates a middle-of-the-road stance that can embrace particular projects, while rejecting others. The Presumption of Restraint can also serve as a model for assessing moral permissibility in other areas of technological innovation.


Suggested Citation:
Fiester, Autumn. (2008). "Justifying a Presumption of Restraint in Animal Biotechnology Research." The American Journal of Bioethics. Vol.8:6. pp. 36 — 44

This is an electronic version of an article published in The American Journal of Bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics is available online at:

Included in

Life Sciences Commons



Date Posted: 07 December 2010

This document has been peer reviewed.