How Much Do We Count? Interpretation and Error-Making in the Decennial Census

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Departmental Papers (SPP)
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Furstenberg, Frank F
Belzer, Alisa Alom
Contributor
Abstract

Following a critique of the 1990 decennial census procedures, we conducted a field study among low-income, inner-city residents in 1991 to examine how they conceptualized and managed the civic task of census response. Interpretations about the purpose and meaning of the census, about commitment to the task, and about connection to government, singly and together with literacy skills (e.g., reading and general literacy competence), were associated with errors that are not detectable by evaluative methodologies used regularly by the Census Bureau. The validity and reliability of census data, and possibly other self-administered survey research, will be increased by greater use of knowledge about both interpretation and literacy skills in formulating data collection procedures.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
1999-02-01
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Reprinted from Demography, Volume 36, Issue 1, February 1999, pages 121-134. Publisher URL: http://hdl.library.upenn.edu/1017/1901 Permission granted by Population Association of America.
Recommended citation
Collection