The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Neuroethics Publications
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Public Policy
Objectivity
Ethical Beliefs
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Darley, John M.
Contributor
Abstract

Ethical disputes arise over differences in the content of the ethical beliefs people hold on either side of an issue. One person may believe that it is wrong to have an abortion for financial reasons, whereas another may believe it to be permissible. But, the magnitude and difficulty of such disputes may also depend on other properties of the ethical beliefs in question-in particular, how objective they are perceived to be. As a psychological property of moral belief, objectivity is relatively unexplored, and we argue that it merits more attention. We review recent psychological evidence which demonstrates that individuals differ in the extent to which they perceive ethical beliefs to be objective, that some ethical beliefs are perceived to be more objective than others, and that both these sources of variance are somewhat systematic. This evidence also shows that differences in perceptions of objectivity underpin quite different psychological reactions to ethical disagreement. Apart from reviewing this evidence, our aim in this paper is to draw attention to unanswered psychological questions about moral objectivity, and to discuss the relevance of moral objectivity to two issues of public policy.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2009-12-17
Journal title
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
Suggested Citation: G.P. Goodwin and J.M. Darley. (2009). "The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy." Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Vol. 1(2). pp. 161-188. The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0013-4
Recommended citation
Collection