Marketing Papers

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version

1-1-1989

Abstract

A survey was conducted of New Zealand personnel consultants. Their beliefs about the validity of various selection tools and their claimed usage of these tools was then compared with the validities in a previously published meta-analysis. The experts claimed to use the predictors they believed to be most valid. However, their beliefs about validity were unrelated to empirically demonstrated validities (Spearman's rho = -0.06). Suggestions were made on the types of research that are needed to improve predictive ability in selection and on the ways in which practitioners can use existing research.

Comments

Postprint version. Published in International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 5, Issue 2, 1989, 187-194. [Extension by Ahlburg in the International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 7 (1992), 467-472.]
Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(89)90086-1

Keywords

employee selection, forecasting, job performance, predictor validity, research vs. expert opinion

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 14 June 2007

This document has been peer reviewed.