Is Advance Selling Desirable with Competition?
Penn collection
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
game theory
pricing
competitive analysis
Advertising and Promotion Management
Business
Business Administration, Management, and Operations
Business Analytics
Business Intelligence
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Sales and Merchandising
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Contributor
Abstract
It has been shown that a monopolist can use advance selling to increase profits. This paper documents that this may not hold when a firm faces competition. With advance selling a firm offers its service in an advance period, before consumers know their valuations for the firms’ services, or later on in a spot period, when consumers know their valuations. We identify two ways in which competition limits the effectiveness of advance selling. First, while a monopolist can sell to consumers with homogeneous preferences at a high price, this homogeneity intensifies price competition, which lowers profits. However, the firms may nevertheless find themselves in an equilibrium with advance selling. In this sense, advance selling is better described as a competitive necessity rather than as an advantageous tool to raise profits. Second, competition in the spot period is likely to lower spot period prices, thereby forcing firms to lower advance period prices, which is also not favorable to profits. Rational firms anticipate this and curtail or eliminate the use of advance selling. Thus, even though a monopolist fully exploits the practice of advance selling, rational firms facing competition either mitigate it or avoid it completely.