Qohelet's Twists and Turns

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
Departmental Papers (Jewish Studies)
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Biblical Studies
Jewish Studies
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Contributor
Abstract

When Elias Bickerman wrote a little volume called Four Strange Books of the Bible, Ecclesiastes was an easy choice for inclusion. As he remarks, "Ecclesiastes has no known antecedents or spiritual posterity in Jewish thought."¹ This is an exaggeration,² but even Qohelet's successors, the Jewish sages of the rabbinic period, found Ecclesiastes questionably biblical. Thus in Leviticus Rabbah 28:1, R. Benjamin B. Levi remarks, "They sought to suppress Ecclesiastes, for they found in it matters that tend toward the heretical."³ The purpose of this article is to highlight what I think is a particularly significant facet of Ecclesiastes' distinctive, and at first glance heretical, stance vis-á-vis the rest of biblical literature. This is Qohelet's emphasis on the imagery of turning.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2003-12-01
Journal title
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
This is a pre-publication version; the version of record can be found at DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030908920302800204
Recommended citation
Collection