GSE Publications

Document Type

Review

Date of this Version

June 1998

Abstract

Since it branched off from philosophy in the 19th century, psychology has had a troubled, dual nature. Some have envisioned another natural science, one that offers causal explanations for behavior. Others have envisioned a humanistic science, one that offers context-specific descriptions of meaningfulness in human experience. The first group reduces behavior to natural mechanisms. The second insists that humanity be described in intentional or spiritual terms. Writing in the 1920s and '30s, Lev Vygotsky claimed that this split within psychology had created a crisis because it had prevented the field from gaining wide acceptance like the natural sciences. Although progress has been made over the past 70 years, Vygotsky's description rings uncomfortably true today.

Comments

Postprint version. Published in American Scientist, Volume 86, June 1998, 2 pages.
Publisher URL: http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookReviewTypeDetail/assetid/15738


At the time of publication, the author, Stanton Wortham, was affiliated with Bates College. Currently May 2007, he is a faculty member of the Graduate School of Education of the University of Pennsylvania.

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 18 May 2007

This document has been peer reviewed.