GSE Publications

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of this Version

2014

Publication Source

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Start Page

1

Last Page

17

DOI

10.1080/09518398.2014.974720

Abstract

This paper complicates the contested assumptions surrounding native research by exploring the burden of representation placed on native researchers because they are seen as insiders. This particular issue of representation is important for native researchers to consider, especially in instances where the research is on an understudied or politically charged group, because of the ways in which the socio-political climate influences both the telling and the reading of such research. Drawing on the author’s personal struggles as a Pakistani researcher conducting ethnographic research with Pakistani immigrants in the United States in the post-9/11 climate, this paper explores and critiques the role of the native researcher and the issues involved with representing understudied groups. Specifically, the paper focuses on authenticity, positionality, audience, and accountability. Thus, the paper is a call for researchers to be more reflective and to think more deeply about their positionality and its impact on the various constituents as they research and write. To encourage such reflexivity, the article provides a set of questions for researchers to consider at different stages of the research and writing process.

Copyright/Permission Statement

The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 2014 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09518398.2014.974720

Keywords

insider research, native research, immigrants, representation, ethnography, 9/11

Share

COinS
 

Date Posted: 05 June 2015

This document has been peer reviewed.