Contradictions and Control in Systemic Reform: The Ascendancy of the Central Office in Philadelphia Schools

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Penn collection
CPRE Research Reports
Degree type
Discipline
Subject
Educational Administration and Supervision
Education Economics
Education Policy
Funder
Grant number
License
Copyright date
Distributor
Related resources
Author
Foley, Ellen
Contributor
Abstract

The central administrators of school districts have only rarely been the focus of education research. Still, the prevailing attitude is that districts are either irrelevant to or inhibitors of reform. Studies of school-based reform efforts often conclude that central office policies impede innovation. The proposals for school choice, charter schools, vouchers, and contract schools are a response, at least in part, to the perceived ineffectiveness of school districts. States and the federal government, more and more, provide funding directly to schools, rather than via district central offices. And in 1994, the Annenberg Foundation’s $500 million “Challenge” pledge, the largest gift to urban public education ever made, bypassed the school district’s central offices as a mechanism of reform in nearly every site where it operated.

Advisor
Date Range for Data Collection (Start Date)
Date Range for Data Collection (End Date)
Digital Object Identifier
Series name and number
Publication date
2001-08-01
Volume number
Issue number
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Journal Issue
Comments
View on the CPRE website (http://www.cpre.org/contradictions-and-control-systemic-reform-ascendancy-central-office-philadelphia-schools).
Recommended citation
Collection