Date of this Version
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Charter schools involve a trading of autonomy for accountability. This accountability comes through two forces—markets through the choices of parents and students, and accountability to government through the writing of contracts that must be renewed for schools to continue to operate. Charter schools are supposed to be more accountable for educational performance than traditional public schools because authorizers have the ability to revoke charter contracts. Here, I focus on one central component of accountability to government: performance accountability or accountability for educational outcomes to charter school authorizers through the revocation or non-renewal of charter contracts. In this paper, I suggest that contract-based accountability for educational performance in charter schools may not be working as proponents argued it would. This article explores some explanations for why there are very few examples of charter schools that have been closed primarily because of failure to demonstrate educational performance or improvement. Future work will need to test if these challenges for authorizers hold in a variety of contexts. The conclusion examines the implications of these findings for the future of charter school accountability.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in Education Policy Analysis, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Education Policy Analysis Archives, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or EPAA. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to Education Policy Analysis Archives upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for Education Policy Analysis Archives to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services. Any revenues from such redistribution are used solely to support the continued publication and distribution of articles.
Accountability, Markets, Parents, Students, Government, Contracts, Schools, Charter Contracts
Bulkley, Katrina, "Educational Performance and Charter School Authorizers: The Accountability Bind" (2001). CPRE Journal Articles. 9.
Date Posted: 20 December 2016
This document has been peer reviewed.